No war is a good sense of population control.
Yes uses up time and resources for no reason.
Add new ideas, those 2 are one of my examples for each.
Edited by Prodigy, 09 October 2009 - 02:13 AM.
War
Started by
Prodigy
, Oct 09 2009 02:12 AM
30 replies to this topic
#1Posted 09 October 2009 - 02:12 AM
Simple question, If we could end all war should we?
No war is a good sense of population control. Yes uses up time and resources for no reason. Add new ideas, those 2 are one of my examples for each. Edited by Prodigy, 09 October 2009 - 02:13 AM. #2Posted 09 October 2009 - 01:56 PM
haha well i vote no because people need to do something from being bored.. and this reminds of when my friend by quote "man this world is so over crowded we need another genocide" so yeah i think we need war
#3Posted 09 October 2009 - 04:09 PM
Of course the war should end. World peace would be nice but it's too bad people are too power hungry to live under the same rules and roof.
#4Posted 09 October 2009 - 04:31 PM
omg u a peace boy? GET HIM
#5Posted 09 October 2009 - 06:01 PM
War economy. is what boosted america out of depression. Still. peace would be nice. but the chances of that ever happening are none. Thats why united nations is a load of crap.
#6Posted 09 October 2009 - 06:28 PM
Thats true without war the USA wouldn't be where it is and neither alot of countrys.. see if there was no world war 1 and 2 then maybe the french would be a superpower and WHO WOULD WANT THAT (cough) nobody (cough)
#7Posted 09 October 2009 - 07:47 PM
but the war is what is putting the US into debt now...
And if there was no war then what would happen would we expand to space? #8Posted 09 October 2009 - 07:50 PM
nah if there was no war we would of overpopulated and killed the earth 200 years ago
#9Posted 09 October 2009 - 07:59 PM
more like if people where smart enough not to have war they'd be smart enough to not over populate & smart enough to not have a system that puts some on the streets & others in mansions.
.knowledge. .respect. .score. #10Posted 09 October 2009 - 09:58 PM
not true cause we'd be taken out by disease so we wouldn't be overpopulated excessivly
#11Posted 10 October 2009 - 01:06 AM
LOL WAR IS PUTTING US IN DEBT. hell no. Congress has been fucking up their spending since the beginning of America.
#12Posted 10 October 2009 - 02:44 AM
so they are still pumping excess money into war. with no intention of winning
#13Posted 10 October 2009 - 12:02 PM
Haha your country would be in debt anyways face it.. and while my dog is still licking his balls ill say this.. .. CANADA RULES!!!
#14Posted 10 October 2009 - 04:36 PM
you are right....... at least i can move to canada seeing how i have canadian citizenship already.
moving on we'll pull through eventually here in america because we always do. #15Posted 10 October 2009 - 09:28 PM
Indeed you will but in the meantime.. Wanna have a poutine and play some HOCKEY
#16Posted 12 October 2009 - 03:13 AM
Balon without war, there would be no superpowers.
No one country would have rule over another. It would be peace and equality. #17Posted 12 October 2009 - 03:15 AM
now that makes sense but if we were all peaceful what would we do.
and would we be limited with what we could accomplish? #18Posted 12 October 2009 - 03:38 AM
Does war accomplish anything?
#19Posted 12 October 2009 - 03:39 AM
it has allowed science to advance quite quickly.
most likely because of the pressure and additional funds #20Posted 12 October 2009 - 09:27 AM
haha actually brain even without war countrys can be superpowers economically sorta like if you have something everyone need youll be massing the prices and get rich hmm one example is greece and the island of crete where crete grew all of the food and sold it to greece who has almost no fertile soil so crete is controlling greece economically which makes crete the superpower at the time
3 user(s) are reading this topic0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users |
|||